Sunday, 2 December 2007
Friday, 30 November 2007
Thursday, 29 November 2007
Traffic jam
Topic: Traffic is developing rapidly all round the world at present, what are the traffic problems in your country? What causes these problems? Make some recommendations.
Along with the development of society more and more problems are brought to our attention, one of which is that traffic issue. Transportation has been increasing worldwide, especially in large cities. Personally, I hold that traffic jam is a big problem in my hometown. My arguments for this point are listed as follows.
First, we can observe easily that the number of vehicles is rising sharply. Nowadays, people in my country get higher salary than decade. That is the reason why more and more people become car owners. As the proverb goes: “Every coin has its two sides”, traffic develop has both advantages and disadvantages. Traffic jam is one of disadvantages in the city.
In addition, the number of public transportation is not enough for commuter. People crowd in the bus, especial students. The experience in the crowded public transportation is not easy to forget for students in my country.
The main recommend is that government should be limited the number of private cars in urbane area. For instance, government should add traffic tax. There is another recommend that deserves some words here. The government should increase public transportation more than now. Government should give dwellers cheaper and more convenient public transportation than private vehicles.
It is difficult to get the conclusion that there is a serious traffic jam in my country. Government should be responsible the issue. The public transportation should be subsidized by government. Another suggestion is that government should take more tax from car owner. We can improve the traffic jam by decreasing the number of vehicle and increasing public transportation.
Along with the development of society more and more problems are brought to our attention, one of which is that traffic issue. Transportation has been increasing worldwide, especially in large cities. Personally, I hold that traffic jam is a big problem in my hometown. My arguments for this point are listed as follows.
First, we can observe easily that the number of vehicles is rising sharply. Nowadays, people in my country get higher salary than decade. That is the reason why more and more people become car owners. As the proverb goes: “Every coin has its two sides”, traffic develop has both advantages and disadvantages. Traffic jam is one of disadvantages in the city.
In addition, the number of public transportation is not enough for commuter. People crowd in the bus, especial students. The experience in the crowded public transportation is not easy to forget for students in my country.
The main recommend is that government should be limited the number of private cars in urbane area. For instance, government should add traffic tax. There is another recommend that deserves some words here. The government should increase public transportation more than now. Government should give dwellers cheaper and more convenient public transportation than private vehicles.
It is difficult to get the conclusion that there is a serious traffic jam in my country. Government should be responsible the issue. The public transportation should be subsidized by government. Another suggestion is that government should take more tax from car owner. We can improve the traffic jam by decreasing the number of vehicle and increasing public transportation.
Wednesday, 28 November 2007
Education
Topic: Who should be responsible for children’s education, the school or the parents? Give your opinion and tell the reasons.
On such a controversial issue, people seldom reach an absolute consensus. Yet I am one of many people who feel that parents should be responsible for their children’s education. My arguments for this point are listed as follow.
The main reason is that family is the first and nearest surrounding in which we grow up. Family does play a vital role in shaping children’s personality. As the proverb goes: “Parents are the first teacher of the children”. For instance, children who have ever suffered from corporal punishment tend to be violent when they grow up. However, children maybe get good scores if their parents can encourage their children for studying
There is another factor that deserves some words here. Rich family can support more educational material for their children. Take an example, rich parents send their children to study abroad, whereas poor parents ask their children to work for living. Therefore, rich family own more chances to enter the university.
What is interesting is that a teacher has to take care of whole students in the classroom. The education from school is not suitable for every student. Let me provide an example. Some students can be quiet in the class, whereas others are not. Some students learn in English and get reading score is better than oral score. Parents have few children in their family and they have can spend lots of time to find what is suitable education method for their children.
On the other hand, it cannot be denied that schools have systematical education method.
To sum up, although school and parents are both significant factor for children’s education, parents should take more responsible than school for children’s education.
On such a controversial issue, people seldom reach an absolute consensus. Yet I am one of many people who feel that parents should be responsible for their children’s education. My arguments for this point are listed as follow.
The main reason is that family is the first and nearest surrounding in which we grow up. Family does play a vital role in shaping children’s personality. As the proverb goes: “Parents are the first teacher of the children”. For instance, children who have ever suffered from corporal punishment tend to be violent when they grow up. However, children maybe get good scores if their parents can encourage their children for studying
There is another factor that deserves some words here. Rich family can support more educational material for their children. Take an example, rich parents send their children to study abroad, whereas poor parents ask their children to work for living. Therefore, rich family own more chances to enter the university.
What is interesting is that a teacher has to take care of whole students in the classroom. The education from school is not suitable for every student. Let me provide an example. Some students can be quiet in the class, whereas others are not. Some students learn in English and get reading score is better than oral score. Parents have few children in their family and they have can spend lots of time to find what is suitable education method for their children.
On the other hand, it cannot be denied that schools have systematical education method.
To sum up, although school and parents are both significant factor for children’s education, parents should take more responsible than school for children’s education.
Tuesday, 27 November 2007
Pets
Topic: Some people are of the opinion that keeping pets such as cats and dogs is beneficial to city dwellers. What do you think?
Nowadays raising pets such as dogs and cats is becoming more and more popular in big cities. As the proverb goes: ”Every coin has its two sides”, raising pet is no exception. In my opinion, I agree with the idea of keeping pets. My arguments for this point are listed as follows.
The main reason why I prefer people rising pets is that pets can be our best friends. For instance, dogs can take care of our house and avoid thief to stealing our property.
The friendship is sincere and unconditional.
Another reason why I agree with the above statement is that I believe it is beneficial to people’s physical health. There is one impressive example I want to mention here. People is walking with the pets are helpful to the owner’s health, especially mature people.
The third, not the last is that pets bring spiritual consolation to old people. With the help of pets, they can dispel the feeling of loneliness. Let me provide an example. My grandfather who live alone but he does not really feel lonely, because he always walks out with his dog.
On the other hand, it cannot be denied that pets cost us much money and waste a lot of time. Take an example, we have to pay for their food, spend time for walking out and so on. Sometimes, rising pets has a negative influence on the relationship between neighbors.
From what has been discussed above, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that rising pets in cities is beneficial to dwellers.
Nowadays raising pets such as dogs and cats is becoming more and more popular in big cities. As the proverb goes: ”Every coin has its two sides”, raising pet is no exception. In my opinion, I agree with the idea of keeping pets. My arguments for this point are listed as follows.
The main reason why I prefer people rising pets is that pets can be our best friends. For instance, dogs can take care of our house and avoid thief to stealing our property.
The friendship is sincere and unconditional.
Another reason why I agree with the above statement is that I believe it is beneficial to people’s physical health. There is one impressive example I want to mention here. People is walking with the pets are helpful to the owner’s health, especially mature people.
The third, not the last is that pets bring spiritual consolation to old people. With the help of pets, they can dispel the feeling of loneliness. Let me provide an example. My grandfather who live alone but he does not really feel lonely, because he always walks out with his dog.
On the other hand, it cannot be denied that pets cost us much money and waste a lot of time. Take an example, we have to pay for their food, spend time for walking out and so on. Sometimes, rising pets has a negative influence on the relationship between neighbors.
From what has been discussed above, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that rising pets in cities is beneficial to dwellers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)